Today I explored several MITRE cybersecurity frameworks that have become foundational in modern security operations. These frameworks help both offensive and defensive teams describe attacks, build detections, and design effective defenses using a shared language.
Why MITRE frameworks matter
Modern cyber attacks are complex and rarely consist of a single action. MITRE frameworks provide structured ways to understand how adversaries operate, how defenders can detect those actions, and how organizations can respond effectively.
MITRE ATT&CK Framework
MITRE ATT&CK was developed to document and categorize the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by adversaries. It focuses on understanding attacker behavior across the entire attack lifecycle.
Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures
- Tactic – the attacker’s goal or objective (the “why”)
- Technique – how the attacker achieves that goal
- Procedure – how the technique is implemented in practice
The ATT&CK Matrix visually organizes tactics across the top, with techniques and sub-techniques underneath. This makes it easier to map observed activity to known adversary behavior.
ATT&CK in real-world operations
ATT&CK is used across the cybersecurity industry by different teams:
- Threat intelligence teams to profile adversaries
- SOC analysts to add context to alerts
- Detection engineers to map coverage gaps
- Incident responders to reconstruct attack timelines
- Red and purple teams to emulate real-world attacks
Cyber Analytics Repository (CAR)
The Cyber Analytics Repository (CAR) builds on ATT&CK by providing validated detection analytics. Each analytic describes how to detect a specific adversary behavior, along with the rationale behind the detection.
CAR also includes example queries for common tools such as Splunk, helping defenders translate ATT&CK techniques into real, usable detections.
MITRE D3FEND Framework
While ATT&CK focuses on how attacks happen, MITRE D3FEND focuses on how to stop them.
D3FEND defines defensive techniques and maps them to security controls, creating a structured way to describe detection, denial, and disruption activities. It helps defenders understand how specific controls counter adversary behavior.
By linking defensive techniques back to ATT&CK, D3FEND allows teams to see both the attacker’s action and the defender’s countermeasure in context.
Key takeaway
What stood out most is how these frameworks complement each other. ATT&CK explains how attackers operate, CAR helps turn that knowledge into detections, and D3FEND shows how defenses can be implemented and improved.
Together, they provide a practical foundation for understanding, detecting, and defending against real-world attacks.
No comments yet.